mediaeyefilm

August - more reviews: The Village | The Bourne Supremacy

Home
January 06: Walk The Line | Shopgirl | A Cock and Bull Story | Memoirs Of A Geisha
Forthcoming: Syriana
December 05: The Producers
November: Kiss Kiss Bang Bang | The Constant Gardener
November continued: Harry Potter & The Goblet of Fire | Stoned | Mrs Henderson Presents
October: The Brothers Grimm | Tim Burton's 'Corpse Bride' | Lord Of War
September: Howl's Moving Castle | Goal! | On a Clear Day | Cinderella Man
August 2005 - Further Reviews: Red Eye | Bewitched
August: Asylum | The Island | Me And You And Everyone We Know | Green Street | The Skeleton Key
July: Fantastic Four | War Of The Worlds | Festival | Overnight | Batman Begins
June: Undertow | We Don't Live Here Anymore | The League of Gentlemen's Apocalypse | Sin City
April/May: Star Wars III | Millions | Strings | Kingdom Of Heaven | The Interpreter
March: The Ring Two | Be Cool | Maria Full Of Grace | Les Choristes (The Chorus)
Forthcoming:
February 2005: The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou | In Good Company
January 2005: Million Dollar Baby | Oceans Twelve
December: Vera Drake | The Merchant Of Venice
Nov: The Incredibles | BJ The Edge of Reason | The Manchurian Candidate | Birth | I Heart Huckabees
October: Finding Neverland | Alien vs Predator | Alfie
September: Wimbledon | The Life and Death of Peter Sellers | Dead Man's Shoes
September (more): Collateral | Exorcist: The Beginning | Ae Fond Kiss | Open Water
August: The Chronicles of Riddick | Catwoman | Spartan | The Terminal
August - more reviews: The Village | The Bourne Supremacy
July - I, Robot | The Stepford Wives | Fahrenheit 9/11 | Twisted
June: Godsend | The Ladykillers | Shrek 2 | Freeze Frame | Confidences Trop Intimes
May: The Day After Tomorrow | Troy
May: I'll Sleep When I'm Dead | The Football Factory | Van Helsing | The Company | Shattered Glass
April Film of the Month: Kill Bill Vol. 2
Guest Reviewer Page: Alternative takes by exceptional new writers
April Releases: The Cat In The Hat | Capturing The Friedmans | Monster
March Releases: Starsky & Hutch | Northfork
The Passion of the Christ
Movie Masterworks: Glengarry Glen Ross
Great Lost Movies: Waiting For Guffman
New on Screen: Something's Gotta Give | Big Fish | Lost In Translation
New Releases: Feb/March 2004 - Elephant | 21 Grams | House of Sand and Fog
January 2004: Reviews inc. A Mighty Wind/Runaway Jury/The Last Samurai/Dogville/Cold Mountain
Reviews: Master and Commander
Reviews: Love Actually | Matrix Revolutions | The Mother | Texas Chainsaw Massacre
Hollywood Educates!
Reviews: Seabiscuit | In The Cut | Mystic River | Down With Love | LXG
Kill Bill
Great Lost Movies: Wonderwall
Great Lost Movies: David Lynch's "Hotel Room"
Back Catalogue: Reviews 1
Back Catalogue: Reviews 2
Back Catalogue: Reviews 3
Back Catalogue: Reviews 4
Back Catalogue: Reviews 5
Back Catalogue: Reviews 6
Back Catalogue: Reviews 7
Back Catalogue: Reviews 8
Back Catalogue: Reviews 9
Celluloid Hot!
Wide, Pan and Scan
The Great Films - Visconti's "Death In Venice"
Forgotten Classics 1 - The Magic Christian
Forgotten Classics 2 - The Rebel
Forgotten Classics 3 - Being There
The One That Got Away

The Village

village.jpg

Cast: Joaquin Phoenix, Bryce Dallas Howards, William Hurt, Sigourney Weaver, Adrien Brody, Brendan Gleeson and Judy Greer.

Written Produced and Directed by M. Night Shyamalan (he turns up in it as well in a cameo, bore yourself rigid and see if you can spot him in a very 'reflective' role.

In an effort to mislead rabid fans and to prevent surprises from leaking out, filmmakers will occasionally come up with a fake title ("Blue Harvest" and "A Boy's Life" later became "Return of the Jedi" and "E.T.", for example) or fake plot details. Sometimes, they will even go so far as to come up with completely fake screenplays in order to preserve the twists and turns and prevent them from coming up on the Internet. It was only a matter of time before the inevitable happened and someone mixed up the screenplays and inadvertently produced and released a film based on the crappy fake. At least I assume that's what happened here with M. Night Shyamalan's "The Village" - unless, of course, he actually believes that audiences are so eager to see his latest effort that they will willingly sit through this morass of incoherent plotting, sloppy filmmaking and one of the crappest ("shock-ending") finales to ever appear on the screen. Actually, seeing his arrogant poncing and self-aggrandisement on tv recently, he obviously believes he's a unique talent, a notion far scarier than anything you will see during his film.

After a couple of early film failures that he would prefer you didn't know about, (including 1998's "Wide Awake" - root it out and you'll understand why) Shyamalan hit the big time in 1999 with "The Sixth Sense", a film that spooked many with its low-key shocks and infamous twist ending and annoyed others for being nothing more than an extended "Twilight Zone" knock-off, though admittedly nicely acted, with a final twist that was obvious to anyone who had actually been paying attention to what was going on.

He followed that up with his 2000 nouveau-superhero saga "Unbreakable", a film that, while a hit, wasn't the mammoth success that "The Sixth Sense" was, even though it was a far more intriguing film -a side from an insulting final scene that could have easily been eliminated if it weren't for Shyamalan's insistence that his films contain a twist ending. For most of its running time, his next film, "Signs", was an absolutely gripping alien-invasion thriller that relied more on mind games than elaborate special effects; however, it was undone by a concluding reel so idiotic (perhaps the worst seen in an otherwise decent movie since "No Way Out") that it actually managed to piss away every bit of audience goodwill that it had gained up until that point. However, it still made loads of money and apparently convinced Shyamalan that he was the next Stephen King and that people would come out for his latest bag of goods, no matter how shabby, on the strength of his name alone. That may well be true but if I had to compare his films to King's books, then "The Sixth Sense" is "Carrie", "Unbreakable" is "The Shining" and "The Village" is "Total PIsh" (maybe King hasn't penned that one yet!)

The film is set in a remote turn-of-the-century town which lives in mortal fear of "Those We Don't Speak Of", unseen creatures that live in the surrounding woods; the colour red, for example, has been banned as it supposedly attracts them. The monsters and the townspeople, led by William Hurt, have an understanding; the creatures won't venture into the town and kill people and they, in turn, won't go into the woods. Of course, there is one young man, Lucius (Joaquin Phoenix), who wants to travel beyond the border but is forbidden to by the town elders. Eventually, something happens and it is up to Ivy (Bryce Dallas Howard, her father is famous baldy flick-helmer Ron), blind daughter of Hurt and the fiancee of Lucius, to set off into the woods herself and discover what exactly is lurking out there. In a shocking twist, it turns out that..........

Of course, I wouldn't dream of revealing what happens (if for no other reason than you need a serious pair of specs if you don't see it coming) other than to mention the fact that there is a twist, a fact that won't come as a surprise to anyone even vaguely familiar with Shyamalan's work. The problem is that Shyamalan has gone to that particular well one time too many and it works to the detriment of the film. Instead of getting sucked into observing both the daily life of the town and the details of the plot, viewers are more likely to be suspicious from the word go, and spend all their time looking for clues to the ending. Even that wouldn't be so bad if the finale, when it finally appeared, was genuinely worth it, but what we get here is so hackneyed and obvious that it looks like a deleted scene from "Scary Movie 3".

Let me put it this way - when you read the paragraph describing the plot, you might have immediately taken a guess as to what the finale might be, only to dismiss it as being far too obvious for anyone to hope to get away with. Unfortunately, that is exactly the ending that he has provided and without even the grace to add a little something extra to keep people from ripping out their seats in anger as the end credits roll.

And yet, I somehow think that some other film-maker (one not known for having a twist in every single film) might have been able to get away with such a conclusion if the rest of the movie had been up to par. The worst thing about "The Village" is that the first 100 minutes are just as bad as the final 10. In fact, the moment things begin to fall apart is the very moment that the people begin to speak and we get a load of the 19th-century patois that Shyamalan has supplied his actors. The dialogue is flowery, overly mannered and never sounds for a minute like it could have ever been uttered by any human being. Instead, it sounds like someone with a tin ear for how people talk attempting to mimic "The Crucible" and the results are laughable. An early scene in which Ivy's sister (Judy Greer) professes her own love for Lucius is so laughably overwritten that the movie never recovers from it. Even actors as skilled as Phoenix, Hurt, Brendan Gleeson, Sigourney Weaver and Adrien Brody (the latter playing someone who might have easily been called the village idiot if there weren't so many others competing for the title, including Shyamalan himself) wind up looking foolish as they stand around uncomfortably while trying to speak words that are literally unspeakable.

In interviews, Shyamalan has claimed that he came up with the idea for this film by fusing post-9/11 thoughts of isolationism and loss with the suggestion of doing an adaptation of "Wuthering Heights". Frankly, as it plays, the script feels more like an early draft of something he wrote a long time ago and pulled out of a drawer once he realised he could give Disney anything as long as it was feature-length and had his name on it and they would give him millions in return.

Even on technical levels, "The Village" is surprisingly inept. Roger Deakins is one of the best cinematographers alive but his work here is surprisingly clunky - the camera always seems to be in the wrong place. Even worse is the score by James Newton Howard - not necessarily the music itself but how Shyamalan has chosen to present it. Instead of the subtle and effective use of sound and, more importantly, silence, in his other films, Shyamalan has chosen to go the other way this time by overlaying nearly every scene with music so obtrusive that it feels as if Spike Lee were put in charge of the final sound mix. Even the quietest, character-driven dialogue scenes are overwhelmed by the music.

The only redeeming facet of "The Village" is the performance from Bryce Dallas Howard who makes her film debut here. The part is pretty much unplayable - the role of the noble, pure, blind girl who nevertheless manages to see all that is going on - she somehow makes it work and when the story begins to focus on her in the second half, it is the one smart move in a film otherwise filled to the brim with crap ones. Other than that, "The Village" is an enraging load of nonsense that is made all the worse by Shyamalan's apparent delusion that he has created something extraordinary. Well, say one thing for him, the man has pride - and I suspect that once the word on this film gets out, his fall will be coming right on schedule. Perhaps this will jolt him out of his rut and force him to change his approach - no more twist endings would be a good start to prove that he is the master filmmaker that he clearly thinks himself to be.


The Bourne Supremacy

bournes.jpg

Cast: Matt Damon, Franka Potente, Brian Cox, Julia Stiles, Karl Urban, Gabriel Mann, Joan Allen.
Directed by Paul Greengrass.
Written by Tony Gilroy.
Based on the novel by Robert Ludlum.
Produced by Frank Marshall, Patrick Crowley, and Paul L. Sandberg.
Running Time: 108 minutes.

In visiting the dark world of author Robert Ludlum's "Bourne" trilogy, director Paul Greengrass is a new addition to the crew to the series (the first "Bourne" film having been directed by Doug Liman), but Greengrass seems to fill the role with ease, bringing back in full force the familiar dark and dirty European feel of the first film.

Often from an American perspective, Europe seems to be portrayed as dark and dirty, something that's especially prevalent in Supremacy as the film's creators have passed over the more picturesque vistas of the cities depicted in the film in favour of dirty streets and graffiti-ridden walls. But with the genre of this film almost requiring a dark and shady look (espionage is always dark and shady, is it not?), each of the technical elements of the film seem created with a single goal in mind: that the characters be bathed in shadow and darkness. From the moment Jason Bourne leaves the sunny climes of India, grit and dirt cover him and the rest the characters. Even when he is in a gorgeous location on the coast of Italy, there's still a sense of grime and coarseness blanketing the scenes.

Like "Bloody Sunday", the director's outstanding 2002 film, "The Bourne Supremacy" is filled to the gills with weaving and shaky cinematographic moves. This buoyant and fluid method of photography will not please everyone. The visual discomfort a viewer might receive from the look of the cinematography might eventually turn into appreciation though as the physical details of the film, like the dirty European cities, dark costuming, and beaten-up cars, really require a primitive, raw approach to the camera work.

The cinematography is bolstered by an excellent grasp of action-sequence editing by editors Richard Pearson and Christopher Rouse. During the final car chase scene in particular, the editors have a field day with ripping into the audience with hundreds of cuts in just minutes of film time. With much of the second act of the film unfolding in a more methodical and quietly intense manner, this final climactic sequence is so rip roaring and breakneck that it's almost unbearable (a harsh word, but it's a compliment).

But where would the film be without a competent cast? Supremacy is fortunate to boast a cast who seem to delve deeper into their characters than one would typically see in an action film. The appeal of the Bourne world in feature film form is an emphasis on both the physical and the mental. The action sequences are quick and demanding and the talkative bits reveal more than simply a character's location in the plot.

The screenwriter, Tony Gilroy, who was also the pen behind the Identity adaptation, has so far brought the twists and turns of each novel into two manageable screenplays. The plot isn't simple and because Jason Bourne has the specific dilemma of amnesia plaguing him, his trek to figure out why the CIA has started hunting him again is not his sole problem. In the true spirit of the modern human condition, Jason Bourne has "issues" that he must deal with concurrently while he navigates the plot.

Coming back for a second round as the title character, Matt Damon again slips easily into the warped mind of Jason Bourne and gives actors in films that would be considered "thinkers" a run for their money. Supremacy is a thrilling action film, but the requisite single-track characters are entirely missing from the story. Joan Allen, playing a CIA executive on a mission to bring Damon to justice, is a proper foe for rogue agent Bourne, and her path over the course of the film is not nearly so cut and dried as one may expect from her type of character. How many antagonists in how many films have been ruled by one emotion and been set on a singular path to destroy or intercept the protagonist or main character of the story? Perhaps the intricate source materials, Robert Ludlum’s novels, were especially suitable for feature film adaptation. Whatever the case, Allen grips the role with an iron grip and is a formidable presence. As is Brian Cox, playing another CIA executive who seems to be bent on bringing Bourne to an early grave rather than to justice. Cox and Allen project and interesting amount of emotion and character onto their faces in addition to the inflection their dialogue, just as Matt Damon does.

The musical score, a final piece of the feature film puzzle, is deftly inserted into the movie's soundtrack, with composer John Powell reprising his job from the first film. Using again the modern, trance-inspired cues of the first movie, Powell kicks his orchestra up a giant notch and takes those cues further and faster than one might have thought possible. Far from simply copying the tracks of the first film and adding slight variations and/or extensions onto them, Powell takes his original music and slaps it into action with a fierce tempo and the volume set on slam.

Character, story, plot, cinematography, editing, music, the elements are all crafted into a tightly wound movie that sinks its claws into the audience and refuses to release its hold until the final credits start rolling. The now nearly signature car chases are easily labelled incredible, as is nearly every element of the film.

An anguished and intense performance from lead Matt Damon would be sufficient in most cases to ground a less accomplished film, but with clever filmmaking surrounding him at every turn, The Bourne Supremacy can't help but succeed on every level.