Love Actually
Starring Hugh Grant, Colin Firth, Laura Linney, Emma Thompson, Alan Rickman, Bill Nighy, Liam Neeson, Martine McCutcheon,
Elisha Cuthbert, Keira Knightley, Andrew Lincoln, Kris Marshall, Thomas Sangster, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Billy Bob Thornton.
Written and Directed by Richard Curtis
For his first outing as Director Actually, writer Richard Curtis (Four Weddings and a Funeral, Notting Hill, Bridget Jones'
Diary) tells an inordinate amount of intertwining stories, attempting to combine every happy theme that he has ever dealt
with, and while there are moments when it works beautifully, the overall result is much too insistent on an upbeat and jolly
tone, stubbornly forcing the Christmas Spirit where it does not belong.
But at the same time, there is something infectious about the film's blissful naivete. The opening scenes set the mood
in a way that's appropriate but not too maudlin - shots of people embracing at the airport arrivals gate with a narrator expounding
on how love is all around if you care to look for it. This montage gives way to a fantastically hilarious sequence where a
washed-up crooner (the god-like Bill Nighy) attempts to make a comeback by singing a nonsense version of a classic song; as
he later explains, it's just "Love is All Around," except they've changed the word "love" to "Christmas."
Nighy's is the most consistently funny storyline, but it is far from the only one. The brand-new and unattached Prime
Minister (Hugh Grant) lusts after his secretary and publicly scolds the philandering President of the United States (a slimy
Billy Bob Thornton). A novelist (Colin Firth) goes to a remote summer home by a lake, where he can finish his book (using
a conventional typewriter, and just guess what will happen to the pages), but is distracted by the sexy Portuguese maid. Karen
(Emma Thompson) worries that her marriage to design studio manager Harry (Alan Rickman) has run out of love as their daughter
prepares for her role as a lobster in the school's nativity play.
I'm not sure whether Liam Neeson was supposed to be doing a British accent or not, but he has one of the film's best parts
as a single father whose young (and clearly British) son despairs over a love that can never be. Keira Knightley plays a newlywed
(and how interesting that her interracial marriage isn't a plot point but a fact) courted by her husband's madly in love best
friend. Sarah (Laura Linney) works for Harry and lusts madly after a co-worker, all the while taking care of her mentally
ill brother in the hospital. Then there are the little people, in the scheme of things: a hapless young man who goes off to
America hoping to find easy sex, Rowan Atkinson as an irritating department store salesman, and a pair of porn stars (inc.
the superb Martin "The Office" Freeman) who kindle a touchingly innocent romance as they perform various indecent
acts for the camera.
Love Actually is so absurdly overstuffed that I actually came up with a list, splitting the characters into "Awesome,"
"Mediocre" and "Go Away." I already mentioned Liam Neeson, but Harry and Karen clearly belong in the first
category: the beleaguered husband and wife are the closest the film comes to subtlety. Sarah also earns a place here, if only
for Laura Linney's terrific performance; she does so much with so little screentime. And Bill Nighy, will kill you stone dead
as the utterly deranged pop singer. I laughed like a daftie every time he appeared.
Hugh Grant gets the bulk of the movie's attention - unfortunately, however, his part of the script often borders on the
ludicrous - the third act has him going door to door looking for the woman he lost, instead of getting his henchmen to look
up her address. Again Shuggie does what he does (can only do?) best - he plays himself. The delightful Keira Knightley, alas,
falls victim to the character overload and simply disappears for nearly an hour.
Then there's Colin Firth, who needed to Go Away, only because he bored me half to death. Also Go Away: most of the minor
characters, including the twenty-something horndog (the big gangly tosser son from tv's execrable "My Family").
But none of them do. In fact, the over-the-top ending brings everyone together again in a perversion of the praiseworthy opening
montage.
When a film has some nine sets of characters and nowhere near the intricacy of something like Magnolia, there isn't much
else to do. Love Actually is certainly entertaining enough, with occasional flashes of brilliance and, when all else fails,
a tremendous cast. Too bad Richard Curtis demanded an ending so unfathomably happy; in the final minutes, the reasonably serious,
occasionally moving film dissolves into some sort of sicko, syrupy fantasy. But you'll go and see it, won't you? And do buy
Bill Nighy's Christmas single, and let life imitate art - what joy!
The Matrix Revolutions
Cast
Jada Pinkett-Smith, Hugo Weaving, Laurence Fishburne, Carrie-Anne Moss, Keanu Reeves
Directed by
Larry Wachowski, Andy Wachowski
The third and supposedly final "Matrix" is so tedious and unoriginal that it's more like "The Matrix Repetitions,"
with one numbing battle sequence after another, all of them looking like outtakes from the last "Star Wars." Even
the trademark martial arts moves are so over the top they're ridiculous, as happens during a shootout in a subway, in which
the shooters would all much rather flip upside down and sideways as they blast away, rather than simply aim at each other!
The dialogue is stiffly Shatnerian, which is a shame, since this is the most persuasively acted of the three "Matrices."
Now to the actors. The three who've been the focus of the first movies - Keanu Reeves, Carrie-Anne Moss and Laurence Fishburne
- are actually on the sidelines for much of "Revolutions," mainly because brothers Andy and Larry Wachowski seem
to be better at writing for the bad guys. Hugo Weaving brings wit to his portrayal of the puckish villain, Agent Smith, and
Lambert Wilson lingers entertainingly over his French-accented lines, delighting in his own pervy evilness. On the plus side,
Jada Pinkett Smith is sexy and authoritative as a freedom fighter, and Mary Alice does well spelling for the late Gloria Foster
as The Oracle.
Story-wise, there isn't a great deal to impart. As before, it's men fighting machines, and the rules change so often that
it's impossible for "Revolutions" to establish a compelling logic. Instead, every time things get confusing, somebody
pops up to explain what's happening, and any time it looks like it's the end, well - it isn't. The Wachowskis undoubtedly
have an underpinning of philosophy and spirituality in their heads, but it doesn't come through in the film's loose and undisciplined
storytelling.
What does come through are meditations on the idea that what separates human beings from machines is that we have the
ability to love, to choose and to believe. Which is an admirable sentiment, but you could skip seeing this film and get the
same thing from a Hallmark greetings card.
The Mother
Director: Roger Michell
Cast: Anne Reid, Daniel Craig, Cathryn Bradshaw, Peter Vaughn
Running time: 112 mins
There is much to commend in this British offering which teams the director of Notting Hill and Changing Lanes with Hanif Kureishi,
the writer of My Beautiful Laundrette and The Buddha of Suburbia.
Films which recognise that people over 40 have sex are few and far between and this one tackles the subject with an unflinching
directness - thanks largely to a generous and brave performance by Anne Reid in the title role.
Its moments of nakedness have prompted comparisons to Calendar Girls by journalists who want to detect an anti-ageist
trend in British cinema. But, setting aside the question of whether two events can constitute a trend, the films could scarcely
be more dissimilar. Calendar Girls, a charming film conceived as a feelgood hit, is nevertheless extremely coy about the nakedness
it purports to revel in, hiding it behind cinnamon buns and jam jars; The Mother stares wide-eyed at its main characters nakedness,
emotional as well as physical, and dares us to look away.
The film reworks the ideas of Fassbinder's Fear Eats The Soul (an acknowledged influence which was an ancestor of Todd
Haynes' recent Far From Heaven) but it has an English repressiveness about it.
It opens with May (Reid) and her husband Toots (the ever-excellent Peter Vaughn) going to London to visit their son and
daughter. When Toots keels over from a heart attack, May, afraid of life alone, moves in with her daughter, Rose (Bradshaw)
who is embroiled in an affair with a married man. Then May falls in love with him, too.
All hell breaks loose, but only quietly. The Mother's turmoil is all internal and apart from Reid, whose performance is
beyond praise, the actors struggle to convey it. Craig makes the object of the two women's affections a slightly swaggering
oaf, a sort of slim emotional gorilla quite without texture. The other performances are one-note and shrill, too; the screenplay
stacks the deck against everyone else - making them cold or unfeeling or self-absorbed - and demands our allegiance to May.
But it bears saying that having your sexagenarian Mum move in and race off with your boyfriend must be more than a little
galling.
The arc of the story, which, it must be admitted, was never headed for a happy ending, is remorselessly downhill. It may
be true to life, but it makes Mike Leigh at his grimmest feel like a Steve Martin comedy. It's brilliant, but it's pretty
hard to take.
Texas Chainsaw Massacre
|
Director: Marcus Nispel
Writer: Scott Kosar
Cast: Jessica Biel, Jonathan Tucker, Eric Balfour, Erica Leerhsen, Mike Vogel, Lauren German, Andrew Bryniarski, R. Lee
Ermey.
There was nothing 'knowing' or ironic about the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre. It didn't nudge you in the ribs or tell
you how cool you were at figuring out its little jokes. It was exploitation distilled to its purest essence, a work of art
designed only to disturb. Its slow descent into a horrifying and strangely convincing hell found power by reaching the most
primal part of the psyche, that animal instinct inside us all that screams run, run, run.
In that regard, it went further than any film before or since, sheltered by its low-budget, fast turnaround production
and affirmed by its subsequent status as a horror classic.
This modern remake isn't quite so courageous. It doesn't have the freedom to push the boundaries as much, and the current
filmgoing environment simply can't support that level of relentlessness. Simply put, it's not in the same league. But there
definitely are some wonderful, horrible moments where it finds those primitive elements, reaching down into the dark area
of our brain and pulling back something black and dripping. Those attuned to such depths will relish the experience, no matter
how second hand it may be, and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre offers enough in the interim to make the rest worthwhile.
The story, which was almost abstract in the original, has more meat on its bones this time around, focussing on five unlucky
teenagers who knock on the ultimate of wrong doors. Breezing through rural Texas on their way to a Lynyrd Skynyrd concert,
bright, beautiful and gloriously naive, their joyride is interrupted by a near-collision with a young woman wandering aimlessly
down the road. Their efforts to help her soon land them in the clutches of the area's only apparent residents - a demented
clan of cannibals whose Black-and-Decker-wielding heir (Andrew Bryniarski) wears a mask made from his former victims' faces.
The terror of the scenario lies less in the violence and mayhem than in the sense of a hidden universe - hateful and
cruel - which innocents stumble into through sheer bad luck. Normal people, reliable institutions, the barest precepts of
morality... they all vanish, replaced by an alien landscape full of leering monsters. There are rules here, but they defile
everything we understand, and the natives hold all the cards. You have been invited to dinner and "no" is not the
correct answer.
Director Marcus Nispel grasps this concept well enough to adequately channel the first film's relentless atmosphere. He
and Cinematographer Daniel C. Pearl infuse wordless dread into the Texas countryside, which gradually reveals the decaying
farmhouse where the true horrors take place. The dividends really pay off in the middle third of the film, as the family's
grotesqueries come creeping into the frame. Here, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre finds its most effective moments, grabbing us
by the throat and presenting brutal shocks well on a par with its predecessor. Nispel has a few trump cards to help it along
(including an appearance by R. Lee Ermey, who can pin you to the back of a cinema seat like nobody's business), and gives
a surprisingly thoughtful contrast between the freakish killers and their Hollywood-gorgeous victims. The protagonists are
all appealing (though possessing the usual American dumb teenager clichés), and we genuinely feel for them as their world
dissolves into nightmare.
Sadly, the mood never takes permanent hold, existing instead in all-too-brief snatches. Nispel punctuates the better elements
with tired cliches of contemporary horror - gruesome jokes, youth-as-transgression, and buckets of gore designed to shock
without really terrifying - which consume far too much of the opening and closing sections of the film. The climax is reduced
to a lot of running through the woods, and while Pearl's work keeps it visually interesting, the terrors of the middle section
inevitably start to fade.
Massacre also betrays a little too much sympathy for its audience, relaxing the grip when it should be tightening it.
This is particularly true with the eventual heroine (well-played by Jessica Biel), whose updated empowerment is a welcome
sign of the times and yet still diminishes the final payoff. Mercy had no place in the original - an integral part of its
strength - and the remake's desire to throw us a bone (however welcome it appears at the time) feels too much like a cop-out
once the dust has settled.
Still, for sheer brutish effectiveness, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre does the job. If it never clears the shadow of its
predecessor, it at least evokes a semblance of the same energy... which should keep its intended audience happy. Nispel gives
a proper tip of the hat to his roots (Pearl also shot the original film, and John Larroquette returns as the chillingly officious
narrator) while keeping enough of his own vision to justify the exercise. If nothing else, it should give newcomers an idea
of what the first film achieved, and encourage those with enough guts to give it a look. Remakes are invariably a letdown;
this one, at least, doesn't slip too far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|